Copeland applies for a loan online falsely stating she earns £60,000 per year when she earns £22,000. The bank approves the loan on the basis of the stated income. DC Singh considers what offence has been committed. Which of the following is correct?
- ACopeland may be guilty of fraud by false representation under s.2 Fraud Act 2006 - she made a false representation knowing it was untrue intending to make a gain
- BCopeland is not guilty of fraud as the bank carried out its own checks and chose to rely on her stated income
- CCopeland is not guilty of fraud as she may still repay the loan - no permanent loss has occurred
- DCopeland is guilty of obtaining property by deception under s.15 Theft Act 1968
Show answer and explanation
s.2 Fraud Act 2006 provides that a person is guilty of fraud if they dishonestly make a false representation and intend thereby to make a gain for themselves or to cause loss to another. The false representation need not actually succeed - it is the making of it with the requisite intent that constitutes the offence. There is no requirement for a completed gain or loss. s.15 Theft Act 1968 was repealed by the Fraud Act 2006 and no longer exists.
- B: It is irrelevant whether the bank carried out its own checks. The offence is complete when the false representation is made with dishonest intent - the bank's reliance or otherwise does not determine whether the offence is committed.
- C: No completed loss is required for fraud by false representation. The offence is made out when the false representation is made with intent to make a gain or cause a loss - whether or not that gain or loss ultimately materialises.
- D: s.15 Theft Act 1968 - obtaining property by deception - was repealed by the Fraud Act 2006 and no longer exists. The applicable offence is under the 2006 Act.