PC Nuttall arrests Lawson on suspicion of burglary at a commercial premises. During a search of Lawson, PC Nuttall finds a footwear impression kit and trainers which may have been used at the scene. At the police station, DC Ross considers whether to give a special warning. Under s.37 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994, which of the following most accurately describes when a special warning may be given?
- AWhere the suspect fails to mention facts in interview which they later rely on in their defence, and the court may draw adverse inferences under s.34 CJPOA 1994.
- BWhere a constable finds the suspect at a place at or about the time of the offence and the suspect fails to account for their presence at that place.
- CWhere the suspect is found by a constable at or about the time of the offence with an object, substance or mark on their clothing, footwear or in their possession, and fails to account for it.
- DWhere a suspect refuses to answer questions and the interviewing officer requires them to explain why they are exercising their right to silence.
Show answer and explanation
Section 37 CJPOA 1994 applies where a constable finds the suspect at a place at or about the time of the offence and the suspect fails to account for their presence at that place. This is to be distinguished from s.36, which applies where the suspect is found in possession of an object, substance or mark. On the facts, the items found on Lawson engage s.36 - but the question tests what s.37 covers, which is presence at a place.
- A: Option B describes s.34 CJPOA 1994 - adverse inferences from failure to mention facts relied on in defence. That is a separate provision entirely from the special warnings under ss.36-37.
- C: Option C describes s.36 CJPOA 1994 - the special warning for objects, substances or marks. Section 37 covers presence at a place, not possession of objects.
- D: A special warning does not require a suspect to explain their right to silence. The suspect retains the right to say nothing. The warning means that if they fail to account for the specific matter, adverse inferences may be drawn at trial.