DC Wright has been identified as performing unsatisfactorily and is to attend a first stage UPP meeting, in relation to conduct occurring in September 2025. The assessor decides to issue a written improvement notice. DC Wright asks her federation representative what the notice must contain. Which of the following most accurately states the legal position?
- AThe written improvement notice must specify the shortfall, the improvement required, the support to be provided, and a review date - all four elements are mandatory.
- BThe written improvement notice must specify the improvement required, the support to be provided, and a review date - the shortfall itself does not need to be separately identified.
- CThe written improvement notice must specify the shortfall and the improvement required - support and review date are recommended good practice but not mandatory content.
- DThe written improvement notice need only record that a meeting took place and that performance was discussed - no further detail is legally required.
Show answer and explanation
A written improvement notice must specify four elements: (1) the shortfall in performance or attendance; (2) the improvement required; (3) the support that will be provided; and (4) a review date. All four are mandatory - a notice omitting any of them is deficient.
- B: The shortfall itself is a distinct, required element - it isn't enough to state only the improvement required without identifying what's actually going wrong.
- C: Support and review date are both mandatory content, not optional good practice.
- D: A bare record that a meeting took place is not sufficient - the substantive four elements above must be specified.